Dameyo

The Real Story About The Bible And Evolution - Shocking Revelation

// August 26th, 2009 // 1 Comment » // General, Knowledge, history

I’ve got this article to my email this morning. So, let’s share this.

The Real Story About The Bible And Evolution - “Shocking Revelation”

The following story is what I believe to be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth about the Bible and Evolution. God created the Heavens and the earth and all the animals. Then he created a Garden of Eden from which he created man from the dust. God called this man Adam.

After a while God saw that Adam was lonely. So God put Adam to sleep. Then God opened Adam’s side and took one of Adam’s ribs and created Eve. God only created Eve as a companion to keep Adam company. God created Adam and Eve without the knowledge of evil.

God did not give Adam and Eve the knowledge or the power to have sex and create. That’s why God created the Garden of Eden. That was Adam and Eve’s home for eternity.

They would never die. They would have eternal life in the Garden of Eden. Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden and the animals on the earth. Adam and Eve would never destroy the Garden of Eden and the animals would never destroy the earth. That would have gone on for eternity.

Everyone thinks of Lucifer as the devil or satan from hell. That is not true. Lucifer was one of God’s angels. Lucifer rose up in evil against God and God drove him from Heaven. In order to get back at God, Lucifer came down to the Garden of Eden and put the evil in the tree of knowledge of good and evil. God saw the evil and warned Adam and Eve not to eat from it or they would surely die. Then God went away and while he was gone Lucifer lied to Eve and told her that they would not die and that they would live forever. Lucifer also told Eve that he would make them into Gods. So Eve fell for Lucifer’s lies and she ate from the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

Then Eve got Adam to eat from it. When they did their eyes were opened and they saw that they were naked. They covered themselves up with figleaves and ran and hid from God. That’s when they gained the knowledge of evil and the power to create. So it was Lucifer who gave them the knowledge and the power to create. It wasn’t God.

When God found Adam and Eve and he found out that they had eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil he condemned them both and drove them from the Garden of Eden, never to return.

Then God placed a guard at the entrance of the Garden of Eden and a flaming sword around the tree of life to protect it from Adam and Eve. Once Adam and Eve gained the knowledge of evil, if they came back into the Garden of Eden and ate from the tree of life, evil would last forever.

God turned Lucifer into a snake to eat the dust of the other animals. When Adam and Eve were outside the Garden of Eden they still had a choice. If they would have gone with the goodness of God and not had sex and created they would have grown old and died and we would not be here.

But instead they went with the evil and the power that Lucifer gave them and they had sex and created. Then Adam and Eve lied and said it was God’s way. But it wasn’t God’s way, it was Lucifer’s way of worse than worse than incest.

Now I am going to explain what I mean by worse than worse than incest.

If Adam came from the dust and Eve came from the dust there would be no incest between them. What ever they created would have been a true son and a true daughter. Or a true brother and a true sister. When the true brother and sister had sex to keep the population going that would have been just incest.

And what ever they created would have been closer flesh. A true brother and sister committing incest cannot create a son or a daughter. They create closer flesh because the flesh is closer than they were to begin with. So that would have been incest and closer flesh.

Now if Adam came from the dust and Eve came from the dust and they had true sons and daughters and Adam had sex with his daughters and Eve had sex with her sons to keep the population going that would have been worse than incest and they would have created closer than closer flesh. The closer the flesh the worse the incest. So that would be worse than incest and closer than closer flesh.

Now the way it happened was that Adam had sex with his own flesh. Eve was bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh. So that was worse than worse than incest and they created closer than closer than closer flesh.

We are still the same because people still create birth defects and deformities. Here are just a few examples. The blind, deaf, handicapped, mentally retarded, shemales, midgets, giants, serial murderers and many more. We are all birth defects because we all have the knowledge of evil. When you marry someone you are marrying someone that is 3 times closer than a true brother or sister. We are nothing but Adam’s flesh having sex with Adam’s flesh and what ever you create is Adam’s flesh.

In other words, we did not come from God. We came from one man that had sex with his own flesh to create. And it was Lucifer that gave that man the power to create. It wasn’t God. The only reason we are here is to destroy God’s earth.

The earth will be destroyed by a nuclear war or over population.

Everyone thinks that Jesus came from God. That is not true. Jesus came from Mary having sex with a Roman soldier while Joseph was off fighting in a war. When Jesus grew up he found out the truth from the Priests who didn’t get married and have sex. Jesus was a 33 year old virgin who came out and found 12 other virgins and he told them the truth. Then with their help he tried to tell all the Christians, Jews and Romans that in the eyes of God they were all brothers and sisters and that they were committing incest by getting married and having sex.

They all got upset and angry and they crucified him. Jesus went back to the dust just like everyone before him and after him. Just where God told Adam and Eve they would go. From dust you came and dust you shall return.

Long before Jesus was ever born there were thousands of slaves that ran off around the world and started their own countries.

When these slaves ran off there was a large group of men and boys of all different ages and sizes that took off and ended up in Africa. Some of them were giants as tall as 9 ft. or even taller. The giant named Goliath that David killed with his slingshot was 9 ft. tall. So there were giants in those days.

Some of these men and boys went exploring to Borneo and caught female Orangutans and took them to South America and had sex with them and created the American Indians. The men and boys that stayed in Africa caught female Gorillas and had sex with them and created the African Americans. When scientists found the bones in Africa they thought we evolved from a female Chimpanzee.

But it wasn’t a natural evolution it was a man made evolution. That’s where all the Bigfoot and Orangutan creatures come from. They are half man and half Gorilla and half man and half Orangutan. They use to call the American Indian the red man. The Orangutan has reddish hair. When those men bred out the hair the American Indian’s skin remained red. The Gorilla has black hair and skin. When those men bred out the hair the African American’s skin remained black. Some of the American Indians and African Americans are tall. And some of the Bigfoot and Orangutan creatures are tall.

They are tall because some of the men that created them were tall. Some scientists believe that we evolved from a female Chimpanzee. Have you ever seen an 8 ft. tall Chimpanzee? I haven’t either.

Bigfoot migrated up through Africa and came into the United States at the top of Africa when they were connected by land. The Orangutan creatures migrated up through Central America and came into the United States like the American Indians did. So that makes us worse than worse than incest and worse than worse than beastiality.

In 1915 the world’s population was 1.8 Billion people. In 2009 the world’s population is 6.8 Billion people. In the past 94 years the world’s population has increased by 5 Billion people. In 500 years that will be 25 Billion people. Add that to the 6.8 Billion people we already have and you come up with 31.8 Billion people in the world by the year 2509. So I would suggest that you stop creating and if you have children tell them when they grow up not to create.

I am 100% sure your generations will appreciate not being left behind to suffer that situation.

Story credit to an anonymous man.

Conspiracy Theory: Assassinations

// April 25th, 2009 // No Comments » // Conspiracy Theories

Death has been used as an extreme solution to a spectrum of problems from the very start of human history. Genesis, the first book of the bible rapidly followed the creation of the world and the expulsion if Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden with its first murder - assassination of Abel by his brother Cain.

From that biblical point onwards, and for the rest of recorded time, murder for material, religious, or political gain has been the option to be used when all others failed, or proved themselves too difficult or inconvenient.

Mercifully, murder, most of the time, has always been viewed as a somewhat radical means to an end; not something that is undertaken

lightly. Even today, killers still use euphemism for their chosen trade or profession. Victims are “whacked,” “rubbed out,” “liquidated,” “disappeared,” “sanctioned,” “terminated with extreme prejudice,” “subjected to executive action,” or “send to sleep with the fishes.” The most bloodthirsty tyrant or the most deviously ruthless conspirator still hesitates to speak plainly about implementing the death of another human being. Joseph Stalin, the despot who ruled the USSR through the first half of the 20th century, came closer than most when he cynically declared: “One death is a tragedy. A million deaths is a statistic.”

THE NATURAL ORDER
For many centuries, assassination was primarily the sport of kings. The slaying of a king, queen, or any hereditary nobleman was not only the death of an individual but it could also change lineage and threaten dynasties.

In a political system where power was handed down for father to eldest son or daughter, and marriages were arranged to cement alliances, reinforce treaties, or combine rival families, assassination was nothing more than the other side of the same coin. The murder of the royal father, or the son and heir, changed the inherited order and could arrange the affiliations of nations.

England’s Henry VIII took eight wives, and either divorced or executed them because not one was able to bear him a son. Richard III fought and won the first phase of the Wars of the Roses for the House of York, but found himself a distant sixth in the line for the crown. His only way to gain ultimate power was to murder or have murdered all who stood in his way until he finally ascended the throne, and it would take another war to bring him down.

THE POLITICAL ORDER
When dramatic elections replaced the rule of hereditary monarchs, the basics of assassination did not cease to be a political last resort, but the reasons for the kill profoundly changed. The coming of the ballot box meant that death ceased to be the only way to remove an unpopular or unstable ruler. Prime ministers and presidents could, sooner or later, be voted out of office, and no son or daughter would automatically rule in his or her place.

Although some would claim that royal conspiracies and assassinations continue today, citing the conspiracy allegations that have surrounded the 1997 deaths of Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed, and driver Henri Paul in the place de l’Alma tunnel in Paris, and how they might have been the work of the British secret intelligence service MI6 with the collusion of French officials.

Diana, having divorced Prince Charles, was already an inconvenient woman, and the thought that she might further embarrass the House of Windsor by marrying/being pregnant by Fayed was - the the opinion of Prince Phillip, the prime suspect in most conspiracy theories - too unthinkable for her to be allowed to live.

For the most part, though, assassination became the expedient tool to those in a democracy who were in too much of a hurry to wait for an election, and of any group who distrusted the will of the people and wanted to circumvent the process and impose a minority agenda.

A prime, 20th-century example of such a negation of democracy happened in Chile in 1973, when Chilean president Salvador Allende appeared to be leading his country too swiftly in the direction of socialism for the tastes of some of his generals, and also those of the Nixon administration and the Central Intelligence Agency in the United States.

Unwilling to wait for an election, or to take the chance that the Chilean people might not vote Allende out of office, a place coup was implemented. Allende died as thanks and infantry stormed the presidential palace, and Chile was subsequently ruled by a military junta led by General Augusto Pinochet for almost two full decades. This was a repressive dictatorship that tortured and “disappeared” thousands of its citizens.

THE JFK LABYRINTH
In Chile in 1973, the objective of the assassination was clear for all to see. The only question has ever been about the degree of US involvement in the coup d’etat that removed Allende.

When, however, the conspiracy of assassins is more convert and shadowy, even their ultimate goals remain a matter for speculation. This was certainly the case in the death of President John F. Kennedy. The truth has been so well concealed and the facts have becomes a blurred in what has to be the most famous assassination of the 20th century, almost every part of it remains open to question.

All we know for sure is that the president of the United States was shot dead, a little after noon on a sunny November day, while riding in a motorcade in an open-topped limousine through the city of Dallas, Texas.

As an angry and seemingly insoluble debate continues to rage as to whether Kennedy was slain by Lee Harvey Oswald, the supposed lone gunman, or by the Mafia, or by a shadowy power elite of his political enemies and their allies in the intelligence community, we are left totally unable to see the purpose of his death, because we have no way of really knowing what might have been had Kennedy lived.

Some theorists claim that the Kennedy administration, had it continued, would have avoid the US’s costly 12-year involvement in the Vietnam war. But we cannot be sure, and indeed, we may never know, as the hope that one or more of JFK’s killers will finally make a deathbed confession grows fainter with the passage of time.

In his 1991 movie JFK, director Oliver Stone has one of his characters state a simple rule at least tentatively deciding who or what was behind a political assassination.

Ask the question “who benefits?” Like or dislike Stone and his work, and agree or disagree with his politics, the usefulness of the question cannot be disputed. Once the question “who benefits?” has been answered, one at least has a working hypothesis of the “why” of an assassination if maybe not the full complete “wherefore.”

History records that Philip II of Macedonia was stabbed to death by his lover Pausanias, at a lavish farewell feast be leading combines Greek armies on an invasion of Persia. Not unlike Lee Harvey Oswald, Pausanias was immediately killed before he could reveal the motive behind his crime.

It might have been a lovers’ quarrel, but history, invoking Stone’s simple test, has always blamed the murder on Philip’s son Alexander. With his father dead, it was Alexander, later known as Alexander the Great who led the Greeks into Persia, brought down the Persian empire, and went onto conquer the known world, while Philip remained little more than a footnote in history.

WHO BENEFITS?
The only problem with the principle of “who benefits?” is that, in some cases, the concept of “benefit” may only really exist in the mind of the assassin or the conspiracy behind his actions. When a tubercular student called Gavrilo Princip shot the Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo, in June 1914, it has always been assumed that he was protesting at the Austro-Hungarian occupation of Serbia.

If this was the case, the long-term results were a long way from anything Princip may have intended. His executive action touched off a chain of events that repidly involved Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Russia, the United States, plus numerous far-flung colonies, and sparked off the bloody carnage of World War I, causing the deaths of tens of millions, and such peripheral upheavals as the Russian Revolution, and the rise of fascism in Italy and Nazism in Germany. “Benefit” may also be an abstract concept like revenge, as it would appear to be in the case of the assassination of US president Abraham Lincoln.

Although some more material reasons have been advanced by Lincoln conspiracy theorists, the weight of evidence would appear to indicate that John Wilkes Booth and his co-conspirators were seeking revenge for the defeat of the Confederacy in the Civil War by the Lincoln-led Union.

Wilkes and the other plotters may have hoped that the slaying of Lincoln would inspire the exhausted South to carry out a desperate and spontaneous uprising, and a fresh round of hostilities, but the real outcome was a fast death for Booth, the slightly slower trial and execution of his associates, and far harsher treatment of the Southern states during the period know as Reconstruction. To paraphrase the Rolling Stones, assassins don’t always get what they want.

Conspiracy Theory: Marilyn Monroe

// April 13th, 2009 // No Comments » // Conspiracy Theories

1962
Merilyn Monroe (Norma Jeane Mortensen)
Actress, sex symbol and pop icon

Marilyn Monroe, born Norma Jeane Mortensen, had been the luminous star of such films as Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, Some Like It Hot, and The Misfits, but towards the end of her life she had become erratic and unreliable due to her use of barbiturates and alcohol.

When she was found dead on August 5th, 1962 by her housekeeper, Mrs Eunice Murray, from what happened to be an overdose, it can as little surprise, and might have been dismissed as either an accident or suicide had rumors not been rife that she was the mistress of President John F. Kennedy, and may also have had an affair with his brother Robert Kennedy.

The Kennedy connection was enough to generate a plethora of conspiracy theories. The most common being that Marilyn was eased into a drug-induced death by a Kennedy insider because, having been dumped by JFK, she was threatening to go public with their affair.

Contradictory autopsy findings, gaps in the time line on the night of her death, the disappearance of her diary and phone records, and witnesses who claimed the FBI joined the investigation for no valid reason were all cited as evidence of orchestrated foul play.

The flames of conspiracy were also fanned by her hairdresser, Sidney Guilaroffe, who claimed that Merilyn knew a lot of “dangerous secrets about the Kennedys.” And a friend, Jose Bolanos, supposedly received a phone call from Merilyn on the night of her death, during which she threatened to reveal “something that would shock the whole world,” but, hearing a disturbance at her door put down the phone without hanging up.

Merilyn’s death will always remain a mysterious sidebar to the JFK assassination, but the reported comment of Jackie Kennedy to her husband adds some credence to the idea that Monroe was killed because she knew too much. “She’s different to the others [mistresses and girlfriends]. She’s unstable and dangerous.”